PREVALENCE
OF OVERWEIGHT AND OBESITY AMONG CHILDREN & ADOLESCENTS.
Dr. Titto Cherian
Assistant Professor of Physical Education, Patriarch
Ignatius Zakka First Training College, Puthencruz, M. G University, Kerala,
INDIA
Abstract
Promoting
physical activity for children has received considerable attention during the
past decade. During childhood, physical and psychological health is related to
participation in regular physical activity. In addition, physical activity and
physical inactivity track from childhood to adult hood. The tracking of
physical activity has strong implications, given the documented health benefits
of regular physical activity for adults. Many skills adults use to become
physically active are learned while engaging in physical activity during
childhood. Obesity among our youth also has become a national concern. Physical
activity has been recommended as an important component in combating the
increasing prevalence of obesity. Because evidence continues to mount regarding
benefits of physical activity for children, promoting physical activity has
become a national health priority. (Blair & Connelly, 1996).
Keywords:
Lifestyle, Physical activity, Prevalence, Obesity
Introduction
Schools
have played a vital role in the provision of physical activity to children and
youth for more than a century. Physical Education has been an institution in
schools since the late 1990, and school sports have been a growing component of
the educational enterprise since the early 1980s. Traditionally, students have
engaged in physical activity during recess breaks in the school day and by
walking or riding bicycles to and from school. However, as we move into the
21st century, alarming health trends are emerging, suggesting that schools need
to renew and expand their role in providing and promoting physical activity for
our nation’s young people.(
Sallis et al., 2003)
Over the years, many public healths,
medical, and educational authorities have called on schools to give greater
attention to provision of physical activity to students. It has often been
recommended that Physical Education programs be expanded, and for several
decades professional organizations have indicated that the provision of
“quality, daily physical education” should be a standard to which schools
aspire. The recent rapid increase in childhood obesity rates suggests that a
reconsideration of the role of the schools in addressing this problem is
necessary and appropriate
Physical activity is important for our
young people's health. Children and adolescents who participate in higher
levels of physical activity are less likely to display risk factors for
cardiovascular disease and more likely to have positive outcomes in weight
regulation. With unprecedented global increases in the prevalence of childhood
overweight and obesity, there is an urgent need for effective physical activity
programs to reduce the incidence of overweight and obesity. (Pangrazi et al., 1996).
Recent systematic reviews of the
effectiveness of young people's physical activity interventions have focused
only on school setting, noncurricular approaches, studies published over a short
time period, the effectiveness of physical activity interventions in pediatric
obesity treatment and prevention or cardiovascular disease outcomes, or
physical activity strategies across the lifespan with limited application to
children, or they were published some time ago.
Given
the central role of physical activity in the prevention of overweight and
obesity, a comprehensive critical review of the evidence is needed. A
meta-analysis may be preferable in order to provide a quantitative summary, but
variability across research designs and methods of physical activity assessment
prevented such an approach. Because so few studies have followed the
consolidated standards of reporting Trials or Transparent Reporting of
Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs guidelines in reporting evaluation
results (e.g., sample size, response rates, attrition/retention, compliance),
it is not possible to determine the effectiveness of studies based on reporting
compliance.
As there are several important
differences in physical activity between children and adolescents (e.g.,
younger children's physical activity tends to consist of intermittent and
spontaneous bursts, they rarely engage in sustained activity bouts, and they
typically have less autonomy than adolescents), this review will focus on the
two age groups separately (Welk, 1996). The aim of this paper is to provide a
narrative review of the evidence of the effectiveness of interventions that
report physical activity outcomes among children and among adolescents. The
review will inform the development of effective intervention strategies and
policies.
With global increases in the
prevalence of overweight and obesity among children and adolescents, there has
never been a more urgent need for effective physical activity programs. The aim
of this narrative review is to summarize the evidence of the effectiveness of
interventions that report physical activity outcomes in children. Children's
physical activity interventions that were most effective in the school setting
included some focus on physical education, activity breaks, and family
strategies. Interventions delivered in the family setting were not highly
effective, but many were pilot studies. (Warren,1995.) The use of
motivationally tailored strategies and program delivery in the primary care
setting showed promise among adolescents. Publications reporting the results of
evaluations of intervention studies should follow the Consolidated Standards of
Reporting Trials guidelines or, for nonrandomized studies, should follow the
Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomized Designs guidelines.
Further evidence of the effectiveness of interventions promoting young people's
physical activity in family and community settings is needed.
Participation in
Physical Activity
Children are more
active than adults, but their activity levels decline as they move toward
adolescence, and significant numbers of young people do not participate in
recommended levels of physical activity. Most of the students spent more than 3
hrs per day watching television.
Physical
Education
Physical Education is a
mandated part of the school curriculum in most states, and daily PE is
recommended by numerous entities. In addition to providing opportunities for
physical activity, Physical Education has traditionally pursued objectives that
are not necessarily directly related to health outcomes. These include
objectives in the cognitive, social, and emotional domains. However, the
percentage of students participating in daily Physical Education classes
decreased significantly from 1991 to 1995. Physical Education
should be a school-based program that provides students with opportunities to
be physically active and to acquire the skills and knowledge needed to
establish and sustain an active lifestyle (Hackensmith, 1966.)
Conclusion
Although schools are under
increasing pressure to increase student scores on standardized tests, the
recent dramatic rise in the prevalence of obesity in children and adolescents
in our country that there is a pressing need for the nation’s schools to systematically
and effectively promote behaviors that will prevent the development of
overweight. Physical activity is a key determinant of weight status.
Disquieting trends in other segments of our society, such as increased “screen
time” and decreased reliance on physically active transport, indicate that the
schools should assume a leadership role in ensuring that young people engage in
adequate amounts of physical activity each day. This statement advances policy
initiatives that, if fully implemented, would position our schools as societal
leaders in addressing an enormous public health challenge. Physical activity
that is planned or structured, involving repetitive body movements done to
improve or maintain one or more physical fitness components.
References
1. Bucher, C.A.(1999). Historical foundations of
physical education and sport. Foundations
of Physical Education and Sport. 13th ed,146–193.
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Participation in high school
physical education—United States, 1991–2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 53:
844–847.Medline
3.
http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/kidswalk/fact_sheet.htm. Accessed March 10,
2005.
4.
Johnson, D.(1998). Many schools putting
an end to child’s play. New York Times.
April 7, A1.
5.
Stupinsky, S.& Findlay, M.(2001). The fourth R: recess and its link to
learning. The Educational Forum. 66:
p.16–25.
6.
Weston A. (1962).The making of American physical education. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
;16(4):310–323.
7.
Physical Education Is Critical to a Complete Education. Reston, National
Association for Sport and Physical Education; 2001.
8.
Grunbaum (2001). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk
Behavior Surveillance—United States, MMWR Surveill Summ. 53: 1–96.Medline
9.
Daniels,S.R.(2005). Overweight in children and adolescents: pathophysiology,
consequences, prevention, and treatment. Circulation.111: 1999–2012.
10.
Hackensmith , C.W.(1966) History of physical education. New York,Vol VIII,p.27.
11.
Blair, S. N., & Connelly, J. C. (1996). How much physical activity should
we do? The case for moderate amounts and intensities of physical activity. RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT,
67(2), 193-205. EJ 533 437.
12.
Biddle S, Sallis JF, Cavill NA. Young and Active? Young People and Health
Enhancing Physical Activity—Evidence and Implications: A Report of the Health
Education Authority Symposium, Young and Active? London, UK: Health Education
Authority; 1998.
13.
Warren, C. W. (1995). School Physical Education. Journal of school health, 65(8), 339-343. EJ 520 865
14.
Welk, G. J. (1996). Physical activity for children and youth. JOPERD, 67(4),
38-43. EJ 528 648
15.
Pangrazi,
R. P., Corbin, C. B., & Welk, G. J. (1996). Physical activity for children
and youth. JOPERD, 67(4), 38-43. EJ 528 648
16.
Stefanie,J,M,
Verstraete, Greet,M,Cardon, Bourdeaudhuij,.( 2007). Public Health Nutrition
May;10(5):477-84
17. Merlin E Jurg.(2006). Health
Promot Int , 8;21(4):320-30. Epub Sep 8.
18. Sallis, J.F., McKenzie, T.L., Alcaraz,
J.E., Kolody, B., Faucette, N., Hovell, M.F.,(1997). The effects of a 2-year
physical education program (SPARK) on physical activity and fitness in
elementary school students: Sports, play and active recreation for kids. American Journal of Public Health; 87(8):1328–1334
Comments
Post a Comment